For his second entry in History of Political Philosophy, Joseph
Cropsey turns his attention to Karl Marx, one of the most radical philosophers
in the book. For Cropsey, Marxism must be seen as an account of human life in
past, present in future as grounded in continuous change. Furthermore, Cropsey
notes that Marx sees economics as the foundation for all of society, so to
understand economics is to understand society. Because of this, humans must be
understood as empirical creatures attempting to fulfill their biological and
economic needs.
Humanity’s economic conditions are
determined by the tools they have available. These tools create the conditions
that determine the prevailing property relations. These property relations
create social relations that create a division between the people who own the
means of production and those who work the means of production. Thus, for Marx
economic “laws” are not really laws as they are a product of the particular
economic conditions of the historical period in which they exist. Marx does not
merely think this about economics either as for him all of human thought is
grounded in the particular historical period they inhabit. Every historical
period has been divided between the workers and owners and it is this conflict
that drives the historical process as the workers have been prevented from
becoming fully human. For Marx, these divisions are rooted in in natural
inequality in the distribution of talent.
Marx also sees civil society as an
outgrowth of the fractioning of society as civil society works as an
individualistic oasis against the community. For Marx, this is a highly
negative aspect as for Marx, people’s status as a social creature demands that
institutions be public. But because this is not the case, a badly divided
society forms which needs coercion in order to stay together. According to
Marx, this is where the state comes from. Because of this, people are
discouraged to work with each other. In order to solve this problem, a proper
alignment of the means of production are needed in order to bring people together.
Under current conditions however, other people are seen as more of a product
than as full human beings.
Marx takes a dim view of much of
what made of the discipline of political economy of his day. This is because
for Marx, as economics are rooted in the particular historical period it exists
in, political economy is essentially a tool for the ruling class. Marx sees
society as being in constant flux and sees this flux as being grounded in the
material conditions. Marx calls this process dialectical materialism. According
to Marx, all of history is governed by this process. This process will
eventually bring about the end of capitalism as machinery will become more and
more developed, but under private ownership the lives of the workers will
become worse and worse. As a result of this process a revolution will
eventually occur which will bring about the end of capitalism. Once this has
occurred, the workers will abolish private ownership and with that, the class
system. This move will mark the beginning of purely human history. Marx says
that the workers will establish socialism, but he does not explain how
socialism will work because he saw his main task as offering a critique of
capitalism.
One of the most significant
contributions Marx made to political philosophy is his work on value. For Marx,
the capitalist concept of profit distorted true value as value is grounded in
labor. Marx saw a distinction between value in use and value in exchange with
value in exchange producing distortions if value in use. Without these
distortions, labor could be more properly seen as the basis of value. Under
capitalism however, these distortions are inevitable as capitalism a turned
labor power into a commodity. This is because there is, under capitalism, a
discrepancy between the amount of labor done and the amount of labor paid for.
This creates a surplus which the capitalists take. Capitalists have an
incentive to increase this discrepancy, primarily by pushing the use of
machines that cause more pauperization. Because of this push towards the
greater use of machinery, capitalism must be in ever increasing flux to
survive. Marx sees this as the natural process of capitalism, and because of
this, the bourgeois (middle class) will become proletarianized (working class)
while the proletariat is reduced to poverty.
Marx’s predictions on capitalism
have not panned out while his predictions on socialism have not been
falsifiable as every existing socialist society has claimed to be in a state of
transition. Still, under socialism Marx thinks that people will achieve the
ancient ideal of the active man. Because of this, Marx sees socialism as
people’s highest calling. It should be noted, that whatever faults Marx has,
one of the most important parts of his legacy is his unwillingness to make
peace with the currently existing order as many of those who came before him
did. For Marx, people may be imperfect, but it that imperfection that moves
history towards to perfection of humans and Marx sees this desire as having very
old roots as in many ways, Marx sees socialism as being the actualization of
religious longing for justice to correct currently existing injustice.
No comments:
Post a Comment